[davidfv]

I am not sure how to normalize the data per regional for just wins and losses. The teams that have participated in three regionals have more opportunity for wins and losses. One of the things that I have done is look at the average score per match.

If one team consistently has more points in every match no matter who the alliance partners happen to be, we might be able to assume that this was a result of a combination of coaching, strategy, team work, and scoring. For example, in LA Regional, using the twitter data, one team averaged about 85 points where the next teams were group at about 65. Call this a alliance score rating. Just some thoughts...