View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 03:09
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
I got the numbers!

Posted by Gui Cavalcanti at 04/01/2001 9:32 PM EST


Student on team #422, Mech Tech, from Governor's School (GSGIS) and Verizon.


In Reply to: Even more interesting numbers: Division of regional winners
Posted by Jessica Boucher on 04/01/2001 12:28 PM EST:



Got the numbers, as insignificant as they may seem. Note that I 2-proportion Z-tested these babies for significance... as you might expect, it is significant, and I compared all stats to the Archimedes division (as they have the most regional winners). These numbers are based on the combined amounts of regional finalists/winners, which may not be entirely accurate. Here are the scant findings:

Archimedes is 83.9% likely to have a significantly greater number of finalists/champs than Curie

Archimedes is 87.7% likely to have a significantly greater number of finalists/champs than Galileo

Archimedes is 95.4% likely to have a significantly greater number of finalists/champs than Newton

Don't know if those numbers mean much to you, but it's all I could come up with right now. If anyone wants me to, I'll do a more anal crunch of numbers and get the sub-categories (i.e. number of champs, 2-timers, etc.)

-Gui

422 - Mech Techs
Richmond, Virginia

"Ok... the tracks are spinning in completely opposite directions when the joystick is pushed forward... that is SO not my code! It's mechanical I tell you!"
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.