Thread: National Rankings
View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-03-2009, 14:28
Legator91's Avatar
Legator91 Legator91 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ryan Legato
FRC #0067 (HOT Team)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 33
Legator91 has much to be proud ofLegator91 has much to be proud ofLegator91 has much to be proud ofLegator91 has much to be proud ofLegator91 has much to be proud ofLegator91 has much to be proud ofLegator91 has much to be proud ofLegator91 has much to be proud ofLegator91 has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Legator91
Re: National Rankings
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyB View Post
I'm not intending to tear down your idea, because it's a good one, but team rankings aren't really a great way to value success or valuing one robot over another...

We already have the OPR rankings that get done which are quite possibly the best possible way to rank teams based solely on match scores.
yea I agree....a team could compete in 3 events and have a much higher win loss record then a team that only competed in 1 event. This doesn't mean the other team is bad, they just haven't competed in as many matches. I think it needs to be based more on how much each team and score and defend. rather then win loss record.
__________________
Michigan Tech: 2010 - 2014
University of Michigan: 2015 - Present

Mentor (FRC 67): 2015 - Present
Mentor (FRC 3771, 4363): 2011 - 2012
Student (FRC 67): 2007 - 2010

2010 World Champs (294, 67, 177)
2009 World Champs (111, 67, 971)
Reply With Quote