View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2009, 14:10
GVDrummer's Avatar
GVDrummer GVDrummer is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jake Hall
FRC #0216 (RoboDawgs OTL)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Grandville
Posts: 65
GVDrummer is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to GVDrummer
Re: Michigan rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Springman View Post
These are just some ideas to create equal opportunity for teams. I have probably already spent too much energy on this issue. Some real quick math offers some options:

Option 1:
132 teams * 2 districts each = 264

264/7= 37.71 about 38

*Cap the team limit at 38. Two districts would have 37 teams, the rest would have 38.

Option 2:

132 teams * 2 districts each = 264
*Eliminate one district. The remaining 6 districts will have exactly 44 teams each. (264/6=44)
This does seem like the logical thing to do to give all the teams an even opportunity to compete in the tournaments.
__________________
Reply With Quote