View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2009, 18:24
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,743
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Michigan rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by GVDrummer View Post
With the teams that competed at West Michigan Regional this weekend, I believe a majority of them have already competed in 2 events.
7 in WMD, 6 in Troy D were competing in their 3rd event. Far from a majority. There was also one team in Lansing that was the 3rd event.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricLeifermann View Post
I'm all for allowing teams to have a 3rd event. On the other side, if they didn't allow 3 events, then a way to increase the # of teams in the later weeks would be to get rid of 1 or 2 of the 7 districts. 2 weeks in a row now we have had 2 events. If we took away 1 or 2 of those, the events would all be full.
With fewer districts, there wouldn't be enough spots for all teams to get 2. We needed 6.6 events to ensure every team could go to 2.
__________________
(since 2004)
Reply With Quote