Thread: BattleCry 2: the neverending sequel
View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 03:16
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: About 2 on 2....
Posted by Patrick Dingle at 04/10/2001 11:57 PM EST


Coach on team #639, Red B^2, from Ithaca High School and Cornell University.


In Reply to: About 2 on 2....
Posted by Jessica Boucher on 04/10/2001 2:01 PM EST:



I would love to see a change for BattleCry, and 2vs2 or 3vs3 (as I have heard rumored) sounds great to me (although good luck trying to figure out how to get it to work with this playing field). As far as this being considered a "blatant rejection" of the FIRST-provided game, I don't think it is. We have played that game for the last three months, and many of us are tired of it. I don't see any problem in changing rules for non-FIRST post season competition, nor do I think FIRST would be insulted by a change in the rules.

Just my opinion of course.

Patrick

: I really think that the reason why certain major changes have stuck within FIRST is because they stick in the mini-comps. If the house rules arent too different from the competition, then if I was FIRST I would interpret that as a "the community likes the rules".

: If it changed drastically (like 2 on 2) I think FIRST would see that as a blatant rejection of the rules by the community.

: And Im not saying this as a "I support drastic house rules" or "Im against drastic house rules", but I think whatever you do, realise the reprcussions and the message youre sending.

: -Jessica B, #237
: the "Pogo Queen" (sorry, this is my first post since Nats and I promised I'd put that in at least once)


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.