View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 03:16
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Acceptance/Rejection of the rules...

Posted by Jon - T190 at 04/11/2001 2:08 AM EST


Engineer on team #190, Gompei, from Mass Academy of Math and Science and Worcester Polytechnic Institute.


In Reply to: About 2 on 2....
Posted by Jessica Boucher on 04/10/2001 2:01 PM EST:



I know that whatever we decide to use will be closely related to whatever we tell FIRST at the summer Forum.

from day one i haven't known what to think about the rules this year, i'm still digesting it...

since i came back people have been asking me how it went and i tell some people it was great and i tell others it was alright and others still that "we've had better years"... and simply, i can't make up my mind... i love having to work with another team because its opened the community up immensely but while its possible to carry the weight of another team, its ridiculously hard to carry two or even three teams.

I have to say, that from the discussions we've had and my stance right now, i would prefer a return to the 2 on 2 approach. as a scout, i like not knowing who my ally is going to be until the instant its go time. its the strategy thing.. the chess-like quality of the recent years games... the game itself goes so quickly but no one can tell me that double trouble was boring.

anyways, just bouncing some thoughts around.


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.