Thread: How about eight divisions on four fields
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2009, 19:42
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
  
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,801
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: How about eight divisions on four fields
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefro526 View Post
I'd have to disagree with this statement. Usually, most divisions field at least two or three alliances that are Einstein Worthy. (2008 Galileo Finals Come To Mind). If anything, this would just make the dominant teams more dominate because there's less of them.
Yes, but if Galileo in 2008 had been split in half, there's a 50% chance that both alliances that played in the finals would have not been able to be formed in the first place.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254