View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 03:21
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Was the winning alliance unbeatable?

Posted by Matt Leese at 04/09/2001 10:28 PM EST


Other on team #73, Tigerbolt, from Edison Technical HS and Alstom & Fiber Technologies & RIT.


In Reply to: Was the winning alliance unbeatable?
Posted by Chris on 04/09/2001 10:06 PM EST:



The second place alliance could've beaten the first place alliance -- but they'd needed to be able to do what they did about 10 seconds faster. It wasn't so much machine design as it was driving practice. Beatty could double balance quickly and reliably -- that's what let them win. The design was great but the design was only part of their ability to win.

Matt who was rooting for the 2nd place alliance just because he likes underdogs


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.