Thread: The "complicated" scoring system
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 03:24
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The "complicated" scoring system
Posted by ChrisH at 04/11/2001 4:21 PM EST


Engineer on team #330, Beach 'Bots, from Hope Chapel Academy and NASA JPL, J & F Machine, Raytheon, et al.


In Reply to: Re: The "complicated" scoring system
Posted by Pamela on 04/10/2001 10:14 PM EST:



: I don't think the scoring this year was all that bad, if you knew the rules it was pretty easy math to do in your head real quick!

Unfortunately your average media person can't multiply, even addition seems to be a stretch for them at times.

:One other thought: Why does animation recieve such little acknowledgement? They work just as hard if not harder sitting there and meticulosly designing and animating every litlle bit and piece which goes into their animation, I feel the deserve more recognition!
: Pamela 166

For the same reason dot.coms are folding all over the place. It's hard to see how something virtual adds value to the real world. Building hardware on the other hand obviously adds value.

Just my thoughts

Chris Husmann
Team 330 the Beach'Bots


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.