Quote:
Originally Posted by LCLARK_175
I don't know of which team you're speaking of or of how far into the Qualls you're speaking of, but 175 was first seeded for a good portion of Friday and Saturday until our loss against the thunder chickens and the 7-0 record of 346 which put us into third.
|
346 was 6-0-1.
I agree that there should probably be a more individualized ranking, however I don't think there is a feasible way for that to be implemented, especially with such a team-centric game such as Lunacy, perhaps something as simple as an average of the alliance score, as a very basic OPR, however whatever you do will be flawed and will receive complaints.
I do happen to believe that the Qual points should be based off the winning alliance's score, not the opposing alliance's score, however, as that is something you cannot control, assuming you don't start scoring on your own team. It doesn't encourage the teams to compete to the best of their ability. I understand the idea behind it, in that you want to have the high scoring, close matches, but it's really not a good differentiator for ranking when the actual robot the score applies to is not factored in, particularly if the robot is primarily defensive, or something of that nature.
$.02