Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve_Alaniz
First of all, congratulations to all the teams for their achievements. I don't want to take anything away from the winners but I do have some concerns about the way the judging went.
I think the most obvious example was the All Star Rookie award. There were some really fantastic rookie robots out there and a lot of people who struggled to make it to Atlanta. But this DOES feed into the definition of a rookie team and more specifically... WHEN you become a rookie team.
Team 3091 is an excellent team and They have given enormous support to FLL and FTC... However, when Woodie was chronicling their activities and reasons they were selected, one line stood out to me. They had done fund raising for FLL/FTC over the summer and sponsorship of FLL/FTC teams before the start of the 2009 season. In my estimation, you become a rookie team on Jan 3 2009 and should be judged by your rookie season IF it is indeed a rookie award. I must have missed something because I have never seen a guide detailing what you should do the year before you become a rookie team. Normally, a rookie team is not expected to have extensively promote the FIRST family because they are... well... new. (I don't think you are even ALLOWED to submit a Chairman's Award bid as a rookie.)
I have no problem with the award being given to 3091. But I have a problem with the reasons the judges chose to give it to them. There seemed to be a bias due to their involvement with FLL and FTC and it made for an uneven playing field for the other rookie teams. Not all areas have FLL and FTC, and FRC is often the first competition that arrives (though I think that may be changing) so the opportunity to help isn't even there.
Still, I'm sure the judges had their reasons but I hope prior involvement does not become a requirement to win a rookie award at the championships.
My 2 cents
|
So I guess you are trying to say that because they went above and beyond what most if not all rookie teams do, then they should not be allowed to compete because most other rookie teams can not accomplish as much as they have. This sounds incredibly flawed to me. We had the privilege to play with 3091 at Peachtree and they are a great group of young people. They are without a doubt a real rookie team, but they happen to be very dedicated and they have some very strong mentorship from many local atlanta teams. Rather than saying it is unfair for a team who is capable of so much to win this award maybe all the future rookie teams should look to this as an example of what should be done to win the Championship Rookie all-star award. It sounds to me like they are already on there way to winning an EI award or a Chairmans award which should be applauded.