Thread: PUSH to Simplify the Game for 2002 ***Attention FIRST ***
View Single Post
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 03:44
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re. General Suggitions for Next Year
Posted by Ameya Agaskar at 04/22/2001 7:00 PM EST


Student on team #293, Bullbots, from Hopewell Valley Central High School and Janssen/Morehouse Engineering/Lucent/Worldwater/.


In Reply to: Re. General Suggitions for Next Year
Posted by Kyle Fenton on 04/19/2001 2:03 PM EST:



: 1. Make it either 2v2 or all 4 working together. If it is
: 2v2 than your main objective would be to will be to
: rack up the balls and head to the center to a fight
: for the big points for the main objecting in the
: center. If I is all 4 working together, you would have
: a chance at higher score but have a harder time
: getting a score. It should be integrated so that if
: one robot doesn't perform its task than it will hung
: the other robots, causing the whole alliance to
: loose major points. This will cause the game to be
: more exciting and will satisfy everybody (meaning if
: they want 2v2 or all 4).

There could be a scoring system like last year's, with one difference. In the qualifying rounds, the losing alliance keeps its score and the winning alliance gets 3 times the losing alliances score; but if they tie, both alliances get 5 (or some factor higher than 3) times their score. In the elimination rounds, this would be abandoned, and whoever gets the highest score advances.



__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.