Thread: PUSH to Simplify the Game for 2002 ***Attention FIRST ***
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 03:44
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Small note
Posted by Kevin Sevcik at 04/23/2001 4:57 AM EST


College Student on team #57, Leopards, from BT Washington and the High School for Engineering Professions and Exxon, Kellog Brown & Root, Powell Electrical.


In Reply to: Re. General Suggitions for Next Year
Posted by Ameya Agaskar on 04/22/2001 7:00 PM EST:



I like this idea, except there doesn't seem to be any incentive to NOT work together. If you're always going to do incredibly better by having a tied score, then besides punishing inept teams, what's the point of having the option? I think this would only make sense if there's some incentive to compete against each other. Granted, I'm generally against a full fledged competitive competition, but I am for competitions that make sense....


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.