View Single Post
  #33   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2009, 22:20
sdcantrell56's Avatar
sdcantrell56 sdcantrell56 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Sean
FRC #2415 (Wired Cats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,038
sdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robots Tipping Over

After subscribing to the train of thought of building the drivebase without any real regard to weight for a couple years, and each year worrying about overall robot weight, I am now a firm believer in saving as much weight as possible every where that is possible including the drivetrain. Any weight saved means adding a new device or function or improving on another. At the bare minimum it means adding weights in exactly the right spots to maintain the best center of gravity. This year the weight savings extended to the point of using extremely fancy and rare plywood in our drivetrain. Next year and this offseason, we are looking into experimenting with timing belt instead of #25 chain as well for even more savings.

In short, every system should be as weight-reduced as is reasonably possible.
__________________

Mentor 2415
Reply With Quote