View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-05-2009, 23:44
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
FRC #1732
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,329
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: Lunacy = Greatest Game Ever

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
Man I have a bad habit of making mistaken posts that get corrected by you, huh :/

Well, my point is more along the lines of "it's part of the game so by trigerring it, you're _not_ playing well regardless if you want to be or not".
I believe this is only the 1st time I 'corrected' you as the first time was more of a difference of opinion....I could be wrong though.

Anyway, I see your point. A team complaining about having a G-14 against them is like saying a certian football team 'would be amazing, if they had a quarterback'. In both examples, the teams brought the disadvantage on themselves (Scoring more than 2X their opponent and not signing Garcia in 2006).

In my opinion G-14 has been way over-blown. What percentage of matches were really determined by it? How much did it really prevent FIRST from achieving its goals?
Reply With Quote