Thread: Did Lunacy really level the playing field?
View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-05-2009, 03:19
KF987 KF987 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Keaton
FRC #2034 (IncrediBULLS)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 113
KF987 has much to be proud ofKF987 has much to be proud ofKF987 has much to be proud ofKF987 has much to be proud ofKF987 has much to be proud ofKF987 has much to be proud ofKF987 has much to be proud ofKF987 has much to be proud ofKF987 has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to KF987
Re: Did Lunacy really level the playing field?
Great post Cory, I couldn't agree with you more. This years games saved us valuable time as far as the drive trains, we didnt have to fabricate nearly as many parts and had two more cims to work with. All we did was remove a motor on each side and set it in high gear.

-This game would have been harder for us to design if it were played on carpet because all of our cims would have gone to our DT. Our design would not have been nearly as complex as what we came up with.

-No matter how many rules FIRST puts out there the playing field will never be "level" because there will always be the teams who are willing to put in more hours, money, pre season prototyping.... In my eyes, teams like 67, 217, 254, 330... will always be good no matter what the game is.

-Keaton
Reply With Quote