View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 04:08
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
My opinion on the matter

Posted by Mike Corliss at 05/10/2001 2:47 PM EST


Student on team #419, Rambots, from BC High and .


In Reply to: I signed the petition, and here's why
Posted by Ian Mackenzie on 05/09/2001 6:00 PM EST:



I think i would rather 4 on 0 than 2 on 2. First off,
one alliance is more in the spirit of first, 'cuz we
know how they love cooperation. It does indeed
promote cooperation, because you don't have a choice.
you could say 2 vs 2 is cooperation, but the way they
set it up, you didn't really need to cooperate with
your team. The way they have the 4 vs 0, alot of
tasks require the assitance of the other teams.

I think they should find a middle ground, more
competative than 4 vs 0, to satisfy our more animal
tendancies, but more cooperative than 2 vs 2, to
maintain the spirit of first.

Mikey in the mi
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.