View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-05-2009, 16:29
ttldomination's Avatar
ttldomination ttldomination is offline
Sunny
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Roanoke, TX
Posts: 2,066
ttldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FTC]: Full Field vs Low-cost Field

Well...it really depends year to year. In any particular case, having 100% of the field never gives a team a strategic advantage over the other, but having essential parts of the field made can be helpful.

Take this past year for example, the racks and the central scoring area were really important to be able to test on and work with. My team built without either one and then we had to spend hours at practice facility making adjustments.

As far as buying a full field is concerned, I think that having an official might be mentally comforting, but I'm not sure if it makes a big difference as far as performance is concerned.
__________________
1261: 2007-2012
1648: 2013-2014
5283: 2015
Reply With Quote