|
Re: FIRST's patents
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart
You have an uncle . .lets call him uncle Sean hes an awesome uncle, always tells a joke when you see him, used to always have candy when he came over, dressed funny but hes a great uncle. OK so one day he invites you to his house for dinner, and from the past you know his wife, Aunt Twiggy, is a great cook. You enter the house and imediatly smell the mashed potatoes a meat roast and several other wondeful foods. You all sit down to the table and start to eat. Then Uncle Sean pulls out a glock slaps in a clip, chambers a round, throws it on the table and says, "hey look what I just got. Dont worry I don't plan on using it." you know he wont, but still you are sceared out of your mind.
|
Reread his post again. The complaints have nothing to do with this argument. People are just responding to the baseless accusations without any evidence about "non gracious professionalism" whatever that means. It is just too vague for any rational person to make a decision. For all we know he could be lying, correct, or just misconstruded the events. Also, what exactly spurred this debate? Your analogy seems a bit off when the gun was documented five years ago.
__________________
If either a public officer or any one else saw a person attempting to cross a bridge which had been ascertained to be unsafe, and there were no time to warn him of his danger, they might seize him and turn him back without any real infringement of his liberty; for liberty consists in doing what one desires, and he does not desire to fall into the river. -Mill
Last edited by Adam Y. : 20-05-2009 at 12:16.
|