Thread: Battlebots an Newsweek
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 04:18
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Let's agree to disagree.
Posted by s_alaniz at 05/24/2001 11:06 PM EST


Other on team #57 from Houston Regional co-ordinator.


In Reply to: Re: Don't see a problem....
Posted by mike oleary on 05/24/2001 4:26 PM EST:



Mike,
We agree that the reporter shouldn't have attributed that action to Dean. That part is good.
We will simply have to disagree on Battlebots. There is a lot more to say on that subject, but MY post was simply to point out the existance of BattlebotsIQ and the error in the Newsweek reporting.
Colleen, under the assumption Dean actively undermined the Battlebot teams, touted the merits of Battlebots. I simply wanted to point out that there is no evidence to support that assumption and that there are major differences between Bots and FIRST.
At this point I'll bite my tongue and say no more about it.

Best wishes

Steve Alaniz


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.