View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-06-2009, 16:29
Jared Russell's Avatar
Jared Russell Jared Russell is offline
Taking a year (mostly) off
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs), FRC #0341 (Miss Daisy)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,078
Jared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Legality of External Co-processor

First, since the 2010 rules have not yet been published, anything that anyone tells you regarding the legality of any component or methodology next year is pure speculation. That said, we can speculate that FIRST might choose to continue their policies from prior years into 2010 (there is a precedent of this...)

External co-processors have traditionally been allowed provided they meet all of the requirements for a "custom circuit". That is, they must be within a cost limit, be powered by the robot main battery, be protected by a 20A breaker, and must NOT directly control any outputs (motors, pneumatics, etc., since this would go around field control for enable/disable, etc.).