Craig, I see your point. I agree that we all learn a lot more from completing the design process than just bolting on and going... and I understand your concern.
However, it's not as if teams don't already use bolt on products. I'd venture to say over half of FRC teams use the KOP chassis and gearboxes every year. Is this really that different of a concept than purchasing pre-designed crab modules? At least with 221's modules, teams are still forced to design a frame and steering system (or so I'm assuming).
I like the idea of making these available to teams who lack machining capabilities... just how I appreciate the availability of pre-built spur gearboxes, planetary gearboxes, 2-speed gearboxes, and mecanum wheels.
It does sound like this product will likely come in pieces and require assembly, and I'd imagine that students would still gain quite a bit of knowledge from working with the system. Personally, I've probably learned more by looking at other teams' designs than any other process.
Keep in mind that not all teams have a Craig Hickman at their disposal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Kressly
Bottom line for us is this... By elevating what ANY team can do, we also push those outstanding teams to go even further.
|
+1