Thread: 4 vrs. 0 or 2 vrs. 2:Some Thoughts
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 04:20
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 4 vrs. 0 or 2 vrs. 2:Some Thoughts
Posted by Anthony S. at 05/28/2001 7:50 PM EST


Student on team #442, Knight Riders, from Lee High School and NASA/BOEING/MEVATEC.


In Reply to: Re: 4 vrs. 0 or 2 vrs. 2:Some Thoughts
Posted by Tom S. on 05/25/2001 11:25 PM EST:



I've only been involved with FIRST for one year and I hadn't seen many tapes of last years game. But just from my experience this year, I loved this years game. I really enjoyed 4vs.0. I also don't like robot violence. We didn't see much of that this year but I have a feeling if we go back to 2vs.2 we may see a little more. Imagine your robot getting rammed by another robot. You'd be very upset if your robot was damaged and unable to compete. Thats why we shouldn't have much robot violence. My team can't really talk because we rammed a robot that had fallen over in front of the bridge during the elimination rounds at Lone Star. Sometimes you have to do what you have to do, but ramming robots for fun is not "Graciously Professional." I hope FIRST continues the 4vs.0 and I also hope we use things like the stretcher a little more. Have a nice summer and see everyone next year.


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.