View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-08-2009, 01:41
EricH's Avatar
Happy Birthday! EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,785
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Help in Inventor 2010

I wouldn't use 1/16" wall in the drive area; 1/8" wall is probably better. It's heavier, yes, but if you've seen old (pre-bumper) robots with 1/8" wall, you'll understand why I'm skeptical of 1/16" in the drive area.

You can swiss-cheese 1" tube; however, if you're going to do it in your drive area, you need to plan how you're going to do it. The drive area is the most critical (read: least failure-tolerant) area. Using a triangle pattern in say 1"x2" is not uncommon, if planned out. 1"x1" is a riskier proposition.

I'm with Akash, if it's 1/16", don't weight reduce at all. I've used that thickness on two robots, once out of contact zones (a shooter frame, using 3/4" and 1" tubes) and once supporting other robots (1", IIRC, and covered in corrugated plastic). It's strong, but not if you put holes in it.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote