View Single Post
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-09-2009, 13:53
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,738
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/FIRST Adds District Event Model Alternative to FRC Program

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Copioli View Post
#2 above is the single biggest argument to give the CA more points. My opinion is 10 points (if someone wins GM Industrial Design twice they get 10 points, 2 * 5).
Personally I think the Chairmans should be worth the same amount of points as being the alliance captain of the winning alliance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIRST
Overview
The Chairman’s Award was created to keep the focus of the FIRST Robotics Competition on our ultimate goal to transform the culture in ways that will inspire greater levels of respect and honor for science and technology, as well as encourage more of today’s youth to become scientists, engineers, and technologists.
The Chairman’s Award represents the spirit of FIRST. It honors the team that, in the judges’ estimation, best represents a model for other teams to emulate, and which embodies the goals and purpose of FIRST. It remains FIRST’s most prestigious award.
If it's the most prestigious award, shouldn't it get the most points?

But any recognition of Chairmans and the other culture changing awards is great.

I would agree that Chm, EI and RAS should only get points for one event.
__________________
(since 2004)
Reply With Quote