Thread: FIRST records
View Single Post
  #91   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-11-2009, 16:59
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
FRC #1732
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,329
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: FIRST records

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi View Post
False. Consider when that third non scoring bot plays D on either of the 3 "capable" robots, you are essentially playing a 2 on 2 match with two mediocre scorers against two phenomenal machines.
It didn't really work out that way, though. After the first match (where the #8 alliance had 2041 do empty cells*), 1732 played defense on 1114 and tried to score a few, hoping to come close to canceling out their scoring, leaving 2041 and 1652 to outscore 71 and 1000, who had no scoring mechanism. In the 3rd match (maybe even in the 2nd, too), 1000 was sent to set picks or block 1732 to allow for 1114 to score. So, that took away the #1 allance's defender, making it a true 2 v 1. I think that having 3 scorers to only 2 was HUGE.



*looking back on it, that wasn't a very good strategy. We felt we needed to score atleast 1 super cell to win a match and 2041 had a dedicated empty cell mechanism, so they were probably the best at it. Well, their trailor got loaded up while picking up and delievering the EC and it took away our best moonrock scorer.
Reply With Quote