Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigHickman
Forgive me if that's a little harsh, but FIRST isn't yours. It isn't an open organization nor is it controlled by outside members. FIRST let you help out. It's their organization, and thus their choice who helps and who doesn't. We appreciate your help in the past, don't get me wrong. But opening up some dirty laundry isn't exactly the best image to be showing off of oneself...
|
I chuckled at the highlighted contradiction in pronouns a little
Also: This. Is. Sparta! (ok ok I'm only here for comic relief)
On a serious note: (I'm not going to comment on if Swando's post belongs in the public domain or not.)
What I am wondering is if FIRST as a whole, or Regional Directors/VCs, should be allowed to pass judgement on something like this. A bad call from the past really doesn't seem like it deems a blacklisted volunteer.
My question is: Unless there's a significant negative effect of a certain person volunteering, is it really, oh hell I'll say the word, "fair" for FIRST to publish someone on a blacklist based on trivial impetus?
Also, I'm curious how you came to this conclusion, Craig. Care to elaborate?