View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2009, 21:37
DonRotolo's Avatar
DonRotolo DonRotolo is offline
Back to humble
FRC #0832
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 6,995
DonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: finding amplitude of a specific frequency

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricVanWyk View Post
What I'm trying to say is that people often say FFT when they mean FT. Its sort of like calling all rectangles squares because you happen to be more used to squares.
Well, a Fourier transform is a Fourier Transform, the only difference is the method used. As Alan noted, the FFT is a method well suited to use by computers. In today's world, the overwhelming majority of the Fourier Transforms actually done use the FFT.

Oh, and it's a ton faster than the "original" way developed by Fourier.

What does it do? It converts between the Frequency domain and the Time domain.

Time domain is what you see on an oscilloscope: The X axis is time.
Frequency domain is what you see on a spectrum analyzer. X axis is frequency.
In both cases, the Y axis is amplitude.
__________________

I am N2IRZ - What's your callsign?
Reply With Quote