Thread: "What is may not be"
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-12-2009, 16:29
DMetalKong's Avatar
DMetalKong DMetalKong is offline
Registered User
AKA: David K.
no team
Team Role: College Student
  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Bridgewater
Posts: 144
DMetalKong is a jewel in the roughDMetalKong is a jewel in the roughDMetalKong is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to DMetalKong
Re: "What is may not be"
Running with the philosophical idea I found this page which happens to mention “Simple Inferential Internalism” (SII). The thing that caught my attention was this quote
Quote:
The conclusion is that SII requires too much...of anyone; even the logically sophisticated. Our warrant for belief in the conclusions of our inferences cannot depend on an antecedently justified belief in the truth-conduciveness of those inferences. “At some point is must be possible simply to move between thoughts in a way that generates justified belief.” (Boghossian, 2001, 639)
Which seems to fit in with the "Nothing is what it appears to be" motif.
Reply With Quote