Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Fultz
I think this rule is correct as written.
If I am RED, then only one opposing alliance robot (BLUE) is allowed in the opponent's zone (RED, because the "opponent's" statement refers back to the 'opposing alliance' earlier in the sentence, which is BLUE).
So, RED can only have one robot in the BLUE zone, BLUE can only have one robot in the RED zone.
|
Yeah, I agree. But if that was the intent of the rule, it should be rewritten without the "opposing" in it. It would make much more sense: "Only one alliance robot is allowed in the opponent's zone."