View Single Post
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2010, 20:36
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,823
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: New Game Criticism

Quote:
Originally Posted by rsisk View Post
Not sure about the new ranking system.

Look at section 9.3.4 and 9.3.5 of the manual and consider the following match

Winning alliance scores 3 points and is penalized 2 points
Losing alliance scores 0 points

Final results will be

WINNING ALLIANCE
Seed points 1
Coopertition pts 0
Total 1

LOSING ALLIANCE
Seed points 3
Coop points 0
Total 3


So, the losing team scoring zero points gets more points than the winning alliance? That doesn't seem right. Or am I missing something?
You aren't missing anything there. But, let's change the scenario slightly. Winning scores 3, penalized 2. Loser scores 1, penalized 1.
Winner: 1 seed, 2 Coop, 3 total
Loser: 3 seed, 0 coop, 3 total.

All you have to do is make sure that there is not a shutout due to scoring capability, and you come out at least even, if not ahead.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote