Quote:
Originally Posted by 1075guy
My question here, is that obviously the INTENT of this rule is to not have a mechanism on the top of your robot, such as a conveyor belt, to push the ball toward your end. But the letter of the rule seems to make designing an invertable robot difficult.
also; here's another interesting way to interpret it: looking at the definition of a MECHANISM:
My take on this is that the specific INTENDED functionality of those wheels was to DRIVE the robot, as opposed to them being there with the purpose of modifying the trajectory of a ball that happens to land there.
|
The wheels above your robot are a mechanism because they provide specific functionality (drive power during inversion).
That said, the rules state that the mechanism must be active for it to be a penalty, so as long as the wheels are not active thats not an issue.
Also there is no rule that he numbers on your bumper need to be upright ... just a minimum height, stroke, and readable
.