View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2010, 12:50
Jared Russell's Avatar
Jared Russell Jared Russell is offline
Taking a year (mostly) off
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs), FRC #0341 (Miss Daisy)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,078
Jared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: No Arm for Blocking Shots!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donut View Post
This means any arm, hanging device, self-righting mechanism, monkey, etc. that is above the bumper zone cannot be used to block an opposing robot's shots. This would constitute changing BALL direction and would incur a penalty.
Is an arm that is not moving an active MECHANISM? I would tend to think it is not, but a succinctly worded Q&A question would remove all uncertainty.

Also, remember <G13> - opposing robots cannot cause you to take a penalty through their actions. If the rule is interpreted in the way you suggest, then shooting a ball at my arm would cause YOU to take the penalty. I am almost certain that this is not the GDC's intent (but I've been wrong before).

Either way, I think to declare that this is the correct interpretation of the rule is a bit premature.