View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2010, 16:27
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,639
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: Where are the globe motors?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody1458 View Post
On a personal note, I never really liked the globe motors. It always seemed that they never filled a niche. If you ever needed motion that slow it was often better to use either pneumatics or the FP gearboxes. All too often teams were just working on the complicated attempt of removing a stage form the globe's gearboxes.
I definitely have to disagree. The globes were among the most useful motors in previous kits, particularly for all sorts of manipulators. They were durable, reliable, small, light weight, provided relatively high power, and didn't burn up under load. That made them perfect for all sorts of devices. While a FP or CIM is much better for high-speed applications, and pneumatics are better for linear actuation, globes definitely found their roles on many robots I worked with.
I remember using a single globe, never replaced, the entire season in 2004 for the shoulder on our arm (which was used for both doubler balls and hanging, though pneumatics actuated the hanging). And actually having iron gears give way before the globes did on our bot in 2007.

I thank Globe for the years of donations, and those little motors will definitely be missed.