View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2010, 17:09
jvriezen jvriezen is offline
Registered User
FRC #3184 (Burnsville Blaze)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Burnsville, MN
Posts: 636
jvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Q&A Forums Opens Wed Jan 13

10: Regarding the definition of CARRYING:

Given the recommendation to design robots to avoid in inadvertent CARRYING, the top side of the robots will typically have sloped surfaces such as a pyramid or dome shape. Can the upper surfaces of the robot be designed in such a way as to significantly influence the location and manner in which a stray ball falls off of the robot, or would this be considered CARRYING? This would be done with no active mechanisms involved so as not to violate rule G45.

Last edited by jvriezen : 13-01-2010 at 09:29.