View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-01-2010, 21:10
Steve_Alaniz Steve_Alaniz is offline
Registered User
FRC #2848 (All Sparks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Dallas
Posts: 211
Steve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_Alaniz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum drive question (Square configuraton?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7-11number1 View Post
We have Mecanum's and they have to be in an X looking down from the top or you loose maneuverability (I think either zero turn radius or strafing). Also, keep in mind that mecanum's have very little pushing power so if you plan to use these wheels your drivers better practice so that they don't get pushed and pinned.

Conceptually, you can think of mecanums as having two vectors, here is a very good PDF on drive systems

http://www.firstroboticscanada.org/s...irectional.pdf
Thank you for that observation! I believe you are right. The other configuration appears to cause a conflict in rotation. I KNEW there was some reason I only use the X on top method.

Steve