View Single Post
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2010, 11:05
StevenB StevenB is offline
is having FRC withdrawal symptoms.
AKA: Steven Bell
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: May 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Stanford, CA
Posts: 416
StevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond reputeStevenB has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Why swerve is better than Holonomic... HELP

Quote:
Originally Posted by Creator Mat View Post
Can anyone who has experience driving a holonomic, playing against a holonomic, or has an opionon on the subject give a testimonial about how swerve is better than Holonomic and the making of a swerve drive is the way our team should go.
First, a picky technical note:
Holonomic is a general term used to describe a system that can be controlled in all of its degrees of freedom [1]. For robot drivetrains, this implies the ability to move in two dimensions. A swerve drive, mecanum drive (jester drive, airtrax), and omnidrive (kiwi drive) are all examples of holonomic drivetrains. They allow movement in both dimensions.
I'm going to assume that my "holonimic drive" you are referring to mecanum drive.

Second, there are major advantages and disadvantages to both swerve drive and mecanum drive. I'm not trying to be rude, but please don't come to this community to enlist support for your side. Take a look around these forums; you'll see that the relative merits of these drivetrains have been discussed numerous times before.

I know you honestly believe that swerve drive is the right way to go. In terms of field capability, you're probably right. But there are a host of other factors, most notably complexity, weight, and manufacturing time, which all affect the decision. And in the end, those factors are actually more important.
There will be great swerve drive robots this year. But there will also be some great mecanum drive robots, and some great omni drive robots. There will even be some great robots that use the kitbot drive train. An awesome drive train might help, but solid ball handling and hanging capability will determine how you do. Don't let yourself think that your drivetrain choice is going to doom your season.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Creator Mat
We also want to go over the bump. I also feel that the Omni wheels would not have enough traction to be able to go over the bump.
Feel? The only way to know is to try it. Honestly, I'd be interested to see what happens - 2359 is asking many of the same questions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geek 2.0
Does holonomic really lose all that much traction? What if you use braking on the Jaguars? It seems that it wouldn't be too bad, the only thing hindering you is the hard plastic of the wheels.
Yes. Even if you have wheels with as much traction as any other drive system, you inherently lose between 50% and 71% of your power. Take a look at this paper for an explanation why.
__________________
Need a physics refresher? Want to know if that motor is big enough for your arm? A FIRST Encounter with Physics

2005-2007: Student | Team #1519, Mechanical Mayhem | Milford, NH
2008-2011: Mentor | Team #2359, RoboLobos | Edmond, OK
2014-??: Mentor | Looking for a team...