View Single Post
  #68   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2010, 22:00
bduddy bduddy is offline
Registered User
FRC #0840 (ART)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: San Bruno, CA
Posts: 869
bduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The ultimate game breaker bot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik View Post
Update #2:

This certainly puts a kink in these plans. The added difficulty depends on if they're making it:
a) 3 inches from a vertical right prism containing all the parts of the mechanism (ie, if you're looking down at it, is it 3 inches past the edge of the mechanism)
b) 3 inches inside some sort of other projection of the mechanism. Like if you had a slide with 2" walls at a 45deg tilt. Wouldn't pass the first test, would pass this one.
As currently written, I don't see anything referring to any kind of projection... so any kind of ramp, or deflector, should be legal. I'm not entirely sure what "inside" is defined to be in that new rule, actually. I fear this update has asked more questions than it has answered...
__________________

Does anyone else remember when TBA signatures actually worked?