View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-01-2010, 02:29
professor1212's Avatar
professor1212 professor1212 is offline
NASA Space Grant Intern
AKA: Moheeb Zara
FRC #1212 (The Setinels AKA Holy Hamsters)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5
professor1212 will become famous soon enoughprofessor1212 will become famous soon enough
Re: pic: Pneumatic Kicker Rev_1

Quote:
Originally Posted by dlavery View Post
Three suggestions:

1. Try a smaller diameter cylinder. The reduced cross-section means you need less air to actuate the cylinder. For a given charge of air, you will get a faster response (up to a limit, as the high pressure wave through the tubing approaches supersonic speeds). There will be a transition point where the diameter reduction will result in less power transferred to the ball during the impact, but I think you are nowhere near that point yet.

2. Try a lighter hammer. This may seem counter-intuitive, but it works. Talk with your physics teachers about this.

3. Pre-load the lever arm with surgical tubing to augment the striking force of the cylinder.


-dave
We originally had it set with a smaller piston for that very reason. This image is when we were attaching a larger bore size in order to handle a possible surgical tubing augmentation. The smaller piston cant pull back the tubing very far...but that might just be due to our configuration.

As for your second suggestion regarding the weight of the hammer....I'm rather intrigued. We were under the impression the weight was applying a large portion of the force against the ball...
__________________
Me: Why are you drilling your shoes?
Abdul: To make them lighter.

"Testtubes and Tesla coils,
clockwork brain 'n' glowing oils,
copper, brass, explosive jelly,
his mechapede policed Old Delhi.
Invented the radio transmitting, too.
Played poker with Theremin, Tesla and Poe.
Harnessed cold moonlight to power airships
and destilled antitoxines from postnasal drips. "
Reply With Quote