View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-01-2010, 18:00
Jones571's Avatar
Jones571 Jones571 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Corey
FRC #0571 (Paragon)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Windsor,CT
Posts: 462
Jones571 has much to be proud ofJones571 has much to be proud ofJones571 has much to be proud ofJones571 has much to be proud ofJones571 has much to be proud ofJones571 has much to be proud ofJones571 has much to be proud ofJones571 has much to be proud ofJones571 has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Jones571
Re: Defense robots for 2010 game..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik View Post
I'm kind of curious how refs are going to rule on that sort of thing if you end up tipping or damaging a robot that was never designed to traverse the bumps. Especially if you end up damaging a robot. I know the whole "Build robust" thing, but there's only so much some of the rookies are going to do there.
I think G38 <A> will apply as if this happens on a regular basis i think it can easily be called aggressive and intentional. As well as G37 <B> which says Incidental contact is generally allowed... So If you are over aggressive and push them over a ramp you may find your self in some serious trouble.
__________________
Reply With Quote