View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2010, 02:25
Burmeister #279's Avatar
Burmeister #279 Burmeister #279 is offline
What Time Is It?
AKA: Nick Burmeister
FRC #0279 (TechFusion)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Toledo
Posts: 207
Burmeister #279 is a glorious beacon of lightBurmeister #279 is a glorious beacon of lightBurmeister #279 is a glorious beacon of lightBurmeister #279 is a glorious beacon of lightBurmeister #279 is a glorious beacon of lightBurmeister #279 is a glorious beacon of light
Send a message via AIM to Burmeister #279
Re: Curiosity on why most teams choose LabView

I apologize for not reading all 3 pages, but i had to skip some to be able to post this.

Last year I was the only programmer and my mentor had no experience in LabVIEW but we decided to take a chance and use it anyways. I am very glad I got the chance to use it however, we never were able to use it to its full potential, mainly due to time and manpower constraints. we were one of the robots at nationals that didn't do anything in autonomous for the first two matches simply because we couldn't figure it out. We eventually did, but not before I fell prey to death stares from four DANA mentors, three parents, 15 students (and a partridge in a pear tree) because our robot didn't move for two practice matches and the autonomous of the third. Our (more specifically, my) inexperience with the software as it pertains to FRC along with its perceived problems (download speed, learning curve, some other things) led us to change our environment C++ this year, and bring in four new members to the programming team. I felt it would not be the best for me personally, but it is definitely working for the team. Overall I'm glad I got the chance to use LabVIEW for the year, but it just didn't work for the team. I would definitely suggest that teams with programmers who have no experience with coding use LabVIEW. Maybe the team will return to LabVIEW as well next year when it can be seen as more stable by the team.
__________________
WHAT TIME IS IT? TWO SEVEN NINE!!! [Team B =) ] Awards: 4 Safety, 2 Ind. Design, 2 Xerox, 1 Nat. Champs
2009 Buckeye Semi-Finalists (1014 & 695) || 2008 GLR Safety Award || 2006 GLR Safety Award
2005 Buckeye Regional Champs (67 & 274) & GM Industrial Design Award & Safety Award GLR Quarter Finalist & Xerox Creativity Award & Safety Award National Xerox Creativity Award & Curie Quarter Finalist (1126 & 180)
2004 Buckeye Delphi Driving Tomorrows Technology Award & Quarter Finalist GLR Champs Nationals Curie Division Finalist
2003 GLR GM Industrial Design Award || 2001 National Newton Division Winner & National Champions
2000 MI DaimlerChrysler Team Spirit Award
Reply With Quote