View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2010, 01:03
Bill_B Bill_B is offline
You cannot not make a difference
FRC #2170
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,099
Bill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 842 Final Kicker Desgin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt H. View Post
In my mind an important safety practice is using parts as they were designed. I also believe safety should be a priority for FIRST teams.
As such I don't think it is unreasonable to encourage teams to purchase load rated release mechanisms such as McMaster-Carr #3899T54.
You weren't always in Arizona, right? That type device is in widespread use for holding and releasing nautical loads established by sails and rigging. While I appreciate the thought about load testing, this particular device would not close by itself, even though it might be possible to get it engaged on the retraction stroke of the piston. I will take a look through that massive online catalog to see if there is a better choice with a load specification.
Reply With Quote