View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2010, 20:26
apalrd's Avatar
apalrd apalrd is offline
More Torque!
AKA: Andrew Palardy (Most people call me Palardy)
VRC #3333
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Auburn Hills, MI
Posts: 1,347
apalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 2108 Swerve Drive

Unless you want to have 1 motor drive more than 1 wheel, integrating the drive motor and transmission into the crab pod might save space and possible a little weight too (less of that giant plate). We had 2:1 window motors last year for the rear pods on our robot (two motors for two wheels, the front two had Globe motors), and they worked very well. We also had ~3:1 reduction from window motors on a crab-drive system in 2005. It worked, although we didn't end up using it because moving sideways with a tetra led to instability. Also, you should be able to turn down the window motor coupler and fit a sprocket on it, then drill new holes and bolt it to the coupler, no need for that shaft on top. Then you can mount the potentiometer to the shaft mount on the coupler, with a keyed ring (to change size) and a set screw.
__________________
Kettering University - Computer Engineering
Kettering Motorsports
Williams International - Commercial Engines - Controls and Accessories
FRC 33 - The Killer Bees - 2009-2012 Student, 2013-2014 Advisor
VEX IQ 3333 - The Bumble Bees - 2014+ Mentor

"Sometimes, the elegant implementation is a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function." ~ John Carmack
Reply With Quote