View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-01-2010, 19:49
ideasrule's Avatar
ideasrule ideasrule is offline
Registered User
FRC #0610 (Coyotes)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 108
ideasrule is a jewel in the roughideasrule is a jewel in the roughideasrule is a jewel in the roughideasrule is a jewel in the rough
Re: 2010 FRC Camera Live Feed Lag

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Rotolo View Post
Smaller frame size means less data to fit through that (relatively) tiny pipeline
I thought so too, but decreasing frame size increased lag time.

Quote:
Fewer frames per second also means less data. 2 Hz is 2 frames per second, 1/2 second lag is the best you can get at that frame rate.
I know that, but I want to both reduce lag and increase frame rate, not one or the other. (I didn't manually set the frame rate; I let the camera do that.)