Thread: Robot Ripstick
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2010, 17:16
Vikesrock's Avatar
Vikesrock Vikesrock is offline
Team 2175 Founder
AKA: Kevin O'Connor
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 3,305
Vikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond reputeVikesrock has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Vikesrock Send a message via MSN to Vikesrock Send a message via Yahoo to Vikesrock
Re: Robot Ripstick

For the sake of discussion, if this were legal what advantage do you gain for the added complexity? Is it worth it?

The only scenario I see this being useful in would be climbing up the bump at an angle. For this fringe case that can be potentially avoided by the drivers I don't see the added complexity as being worth it.

Regarding the legality, as Al mentioned above the Frame Perimeter restrictions would apply. You would need a fixed, non-pivoting frame perimeter structure, a separate structure for the wheels that articulates the way you want and some type of spring or gas shock to connect them.
__________________


2007 Wisconsin Regional Highest Rookie Seed & Regional Finalists (Thanks 930 & 2039)
2008 MN Regional Semifinalists (Thanks 2472 & 1756)
2009 Northstar Regional Semifinalists (Thanks 171 & 525)