View Single Post
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-01-2010, 21:54
mikelowry mikelowry is offline
Registered User
FRC #1771 (N.G.R.)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Suwanee GA
Posts: 63
mikelowry is a name known to allmikelowry is a name known to allmikelowry is a name known to allmikelowry is a name known to allmikelowry is a name known to allmikelowry is a name known to all
Re: Fasteners extending outside the FRAME PERIMETER

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz View Post
Martin,
Team Update 6 modifies the definition of the FRAME PERIMETER and as such modifies the rules that reference the definition including R16. My impression then is that fasteners as described in TU6 will not be considered to be outside the FRAME PERIMETER in the bumper zone or elsewhere. The drawings displayed this afternoon in this thread are therefore legal.
The update does not modify the definition of the FRAME PERIMETER, it simply says that fasteners are excluded from the determination of it. Which essentially means that even the workaround that was mentioned earlier (using identical dummy bolts in the bumper zone to enlarge the frame perimeter to allow bolt heads to protrude below the bumper zone) will not work because the dummy bolts will not define the FRAME PERIMETER. Thus with the current wording no bolts are allowed to protrude from the FRAME PERIMETER in any place.

However, I agree with Martin, that the update was misworded and the intent of the update is to allow fasteners to protrude, even though the update clearly states that no fasteners can protrude anywhere.
__________________


2008 Xerox Creativity Award - Championships
2009 Rockwell Automation Innovation in Control award - Peachtree
2009 GM Industrial Design Award - Palmetto
2009 Palmetto Champions <1771 2415 21>