View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-01-2010, 19:48
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,071
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Pneumatics cv.32

Hi Mike,


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Betts View Post
If you read my original post, I stated that I thought that the GDC would have to correct this oversight.
I read your original post, and I understood your statement. I disagree with your statement. Explanation follows.


Quote:
As the rules read right now, I am permitted to use .160 ID, I do not have to...
To me, the rules are clear that .160 is required, because of Rule<R71>:

no pneumatic parts other than those explicitly permitted by the Pneumatic System Rules may be used on the ROBOT

Quote:
I really don't want to lawyer this.
Neither do I.

Quote:
IMHO, the intent is to limit air flow
Agree!!

Quote:
and the GDC will have to amend the rules to enforce it...
disagree.

Quote:
I would suggest that you have your Main Team Contact ask via the official Q&A.
We don't need to. We plan to follow Rule <R71> and use only the explicitly permitted pneumatic parts.


Quote:
As a mere lead inspector, I do not have the authority to do so...
Thanks for the time and effort you put into being an inspector. It is appreciated.

Grace,

Ether

Last edited by Ether : 31-01-2010 at 00:46.
Reply With Quote