[Jon K.]

In my opinion the game was not spectator friendly at all. The thing that FIRST needs to do if at all possible is to create a complex strategy game while making it as spectator friendly as possible. The fact that the 2002 game was not spectator friendly makes it really hard to describe. Especially to someone unrelated to FIRST, like a CEO of a business who you are hoping to have sponsor your team, or a relative that you are just casually talking to unless you have a diagram or some sort of visual aid and because of this the person may lose interest in what you have to say however important it may be and you may lose the potential sponsor. So not only does it need to be complex but also needs to be spectator friendly. And we all know that the great folks at FIRST can make this happen. so when it comes down to my vote the option I would have liked to have chosen (either, other or liked the strategy but not the game) is not up on the poll as one of the choices.