View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2010, 23:23
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,601
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: The Spirit of FIRST

Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerborn View Post
I know that we only have 6 weeks to build the best robot we possibly can. However what stops a team from building two bots, ship one, and then get an extra few weeks to practice driving with the other. I know that a few teams do this, and those teams are also very good.
Nothing does. It's been known about for years, and is not disallowed. You should try it sometime.

Quote:
This is totally against the spirit of FIRST,
I'm assuming by this you mean "against the 6 week build cycle". It's not, since you can't incorporate practice bot changes on your real robot outside of fix-it windows if I understand the rules correctly (I don't really need to as I'm not building one).

Quote:
and gives an unfair advantage to those teams
How is it unfair? They worked harder to get more money to do so, and they chose to do so, which is a smart decision.

If you're able, yet unwilling, to do something completely within the rules, it's not "unfair" that others are doing what you don't. If you're unable... fundraise more!

Quote:
and should not be allowed.
The GDC has had multiple opportunities to make it against the rules. Practice bots have been common since the introduction of autonomy.

Quote:
It all comes down to if you think Dean would be upset, or not, with what those teams are doing.
No it doesn't. Even if it did, I'm sure many, MANY people in FIRST are fully aware of practice robots, and if it upset too many of them, it wouldn't be like it is now.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
Reply With Quote